Distinguishing My Nationalism from Socialism

Typical definitions of Nationalism are perverted and poorly described.

Liberal-nationalism to me is wanting the best possible system for the country and peoples based on working models, historical examples and proven methods that lead to prosperity.

Laissez-Faire capitalism is needed, Specific careful nationalization is needed.

The nationalism I propose must be in the form of projects: voted on by legislative branches and then submitted for a governors vote to ensure the peoples consent.

In nationalism everyone contributes to a cause and everyone gets the benefits equally in a most efficient manner..


Socialism is gov't or collective control over Land, Labor, Capital, Entrepreneurship.

Some examples are California, Massachusetts, our schools and healthcare systems.

California has a huge mounting debt and the state is bankrupt, why? Well, in 1978 they opted to switch to a direct ballot democratic policy which then in turn let "the people" directly vote on legislative bills. What is so bad about this you may ask - If I gave you my credit card and said hey, you can do w/e you want and buy w/e you want and I'll pay for it, what would you do? You, probably, like most people would buy stuff for yourself; afterall I allowed it, I Encouraged it. Ok, so after a few years I submit a proposal that says "look I need to ask you to pay a percentage of my bills or i will go bankrupt" and well you refuse; what happens... I go bankrupt funding socialism.

Massachussets healthcare and regulations have failed. Quoted from the boston globe

- "MASSACHUSETTS HAS been lauded for its healthcare reform, but the program is a failure. Created solely to achieve universal insurance coverage, the plan does not even begin to address the other essential components of a successful healthcare system.

What would such a system provide? The prestigious Institute of Medicine, part of the National Academy of Sciences, has defined five criteria for healthcare reform. Coverage should be: universal, not tied to a job, affordable for individuals and families, affordable for society, and it should provide access to high-quality care for everyone.

The state's plan flunks on all counts." -


Our socialized schools are a disaster, statistics prove that.

Our socialized healthcare is a broken system.

Full article on Massachusetts healthcare at Boston globe(http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/02/mass_healthcare_reform_is_failing_us/)